Written by Michael
Coleman, Regulatory Compliance Counsel
Last week we
blogged about the CFPB’s Small entity compliance Guide for the Ability to
Repay/Qualified Mortgage final rule, as well as some NAFCU
resources on the CFPB’s final mortgage rules, specifically about the points and fees caps contained in the qualified mortgage final rule.
Today we’d like take a look at H.R. 1077, the
Consumer Mortgage Choice Act, introduced by Representative Bill Huizenga on March 12, 2013. If you have
ever talked with me on the phone (particularly about some kind of a
violation/non-compliance with a regulation), you might have heard me utter one
of my favorite sayings: “you can’t unscramble those eggs.” Well, we mere-mortal
compliance officers might not be able to unscramble those eggs, but Congress
sure can.
The final rule on ability to repay and
qualified mortgages section 1026.43(e)(3) contains restrictions on points and
fees for qualified mortgages. H.R. 1077 would amend the Truth in Lending Act
(TILA) definition of “points and fees.”
On May 3rd, Dan Berger, NAFCU’s Executive Vice President of Government Affairs, sent a letter on H.R. 1077 to Rep. Jeb
Hensarling, the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Rep.
Maxine Waters, the ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, here’s an excerpt:
“As currently defined, “points and fees” include,
among other charges, fees paid to affiliated title companies, salaries paid to
loan originators, amounts of insurance and taxes held in escrow, loan level
price adjustments, and payments by lenders to correspondent banks, credit
unions and mortgage brokers in wholesale transactions. As a result of this troublesome definition,
many affiliated loans, particularly those made to low- and moderate-income
borrowers, would not qualify as Qualified Mortgages (QMs) and would be unlikely
to be made or would only be available at higher rates due to heightened
liability risks. Consumers would lose
the ability to choose to take advantage of the convenience and market
efficiencies offered by one-stop shopping.
The Consumer
Mortgage Choice Act would make important changes that would:
- Exclude title charges from “points and
fees” definition.
- Prevent double-counting of loan officer
compensation.
- Clarify that escrow charges should be
excluded from any calculation of “points and fees.”
- Exclude loan level pricing adjustments
(LLPAs).
- Exclude lender-paid compensation to
mortgage brokers.
Taken together, these changes would make important improvements
to the definition of “points and fees” used to determine whether a loan meets
the QM test.”
Contact your members
of Congress. My colleague Katie Marisic – NAFCU’s Director of Political
Affairs- wrote a great
guest blog a while back about the importance of reaching out to
your members of Congress on important issues that affect credit unions. As Katie pointed out, legislative advocacy is
an important means by which credit unions (and their members) can help stem the
tide of regulatory burden. And every now and then, a bill is introduced that
will do just that – help credit unions by directly reducing regulatory burden.
Or as I like to say: “unscrambling those eggs.” Check out NAFCU's Legislative Resource Center, it has links to help you find your Representative, as well as other great resources such as NAFCU’s Grassroots Action Network.
I don’t know about you, but I would much rather be spending
my free time watching the Capitals playoffs than worrying about the points and
fees calculations for qualified mortgages.
Recent Comments