NAFCU Compliance Blog

NAFCU Urges Regulatory Coordination; FSOC Annual Report

Written by Michael Coleman, Regulatory Compliance Counsel

There is no denying the fact that regulatory burden is a major issue faced by the credit union industry. Even so, I still sometimes feel like the boy who cried wolf when I am constantly talking about regulatory burden and compliance issues faced by credit unions. But then I remind myself that there actually are wolves out there, and they have really big teeth. As I mentioned in this blog post a while back, I tend to speak in quaint colloquialisms from time to time, and I have been known to make up a word or two as well. If you have ever spoken with me in person or on the phone, you might have heard me refer to the current regulatory environment as "The Reg-pocalypse."  

With this in mind, NAFCU is constantly advocating on behalf of our members to try and reduce regulatory burden and provide regulatory relief for credit unions. For example, NAFCU's Five-Point Plan for Regulatory Relief calls on Congress to provide comprehensive broad-based regulatory relief for credit unions. However, in addition to legislative measures,  there are other steps which can be taken to help provide regulatory relief to the credit union industry. 

As we mentioned in this blog post, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) recently issued their 2013 Annual Report detailing the activities of the Council, significant market and regulatory developments, and potential emerging threats to the financial stability of the United States. However, notably absent is any discussion of regulatory burden on financial institutions. This is incredibly unfortunate as the FSOC has a statutory mandate from Dodd-Frank to facilitate coordination between federal regulators.

On May 20th, Fred Becker, NAFCU's President and CEO, sent a letter on the FSOC and regulatory coodination to Sen. Tim Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, and Sen. Michael Crapo, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Banking, expounding the need for the FSOC to take seriously its duty to facilitate regulatory coordination, here is an excerpt: 

"As the tide of regulation rises, there has never been a more critical time for the FSOC, led by Secretary Lew, to facilitate regulatory coordination among its member regulators. This duty includes facilitating information sharing and coordination among the member agencies of domestic financial services policy development, rulemaking, examinations, reporting requirements and enforcement actions. As outlined in the attached letter to then Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in June of 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Act the FSOC is effectively charged with ameliorating weaknesses within the regulatory structure therein providing a safe and more stable system as a whole. NAFCU appreciates the committee’s focus on the activities of the FSOC and looks forwarding to learning more about the steps that have been taken to avoid duplicative and over burdensome regulation of our nation’s credit unions."

A similar letter was also sent on May 21st to Rep. Jeb Hensarling, the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Rep. Maxine Waters, the ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee. Here's hoping we see some relief! 

H.R. 1077, the Consumer Mortgage Choice Act; QM Points and Fees Caps - Part 3

Written by Michael Coleman, Regulatory Compliance Counsel

Last week we blogged about the CFPB’s Small entity compliance Guide for the Ability to Repay/Qualified Mortgage final rule, as well as some NAFCU resources on the CFPB’s final mortgage rules, specifically about the points and fees caps contained in the qualified mortgage final rule.

Today we’d like take a look at H.R. 1077, the Consumer Mortgage Choice Act, introduced by Representative Bill Huizenga on March 12, 2013. If you have ever talked with me on the phone (particularly about some kind of a violation/non-compliance with a regulation), you might have heard me utter one of my favorite sayings: “you can’t unscramble those eggs.” Well, we mere-mortal compliance officers might not be able to unscramble those eggs, but Congress sure can.

The final rule on ability to repay and qualified mortgages section 1026.43(e)(3) contains restrictions on points and fees for qualified mortgages. H.R. 1077 would amend the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) definition of “points and fees.”

On May 3rd, Dan Berger, NAFCU’s Executive Vice President of Government Affairs, sent a letter on H.R. 1077 to Rep. Jeb Hensarling, the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Rep. Maxine Waters, the ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, here’s an excerpt:

“As currently defined, “points and fees” include, among other charges, fees paid to affiliated title companies, salaries paid to loan originators, amounts of insurance and taxes held in escrow, loan level price adjustments, and payments by lenders to correspondent banks, credit unions and mortgage brokers in wholesale transactions.  As a result of this troublesome definition, many affiliated loans, particularly those made to low- and moderate-income borrowers, would not qualify as Qualified Mortgages (QMs) and would be unlikely to be made or would only be available at higher rates due to heightened liability risks.  Consumers would lose the ability to choose to take advantage of the convenience and market efficiencies offered by one-stop shopping.

The Consumer Mortgage Choice Act would make important changes that would:

- Exclude title charges from “points and fees” definition. 

- Prevent double-counting of loan officer compensation.  

- Clarify that escrow charges should be excluded from any calculation of “points and fees.”

- Exclude loan level pricing adjustments (LLPAs).     

- Exclude lender-paid compensation to mortgage brokers. 

 Taken together, these changes would make important improvements to the definition of “points and fees” used to determine whether a loan meets the QM test.” 

 Contact your members of Congress. My colleague Katie Marisic – NAFCU’s Director of Political Affairs- wrote a great guest blog a while back about the importance of reaching out to your members of Congress on important issues that affect credit unions.  As Katie pointed out, legislative advocacy is an important means by which credit unions (and their members) can help stem the tide of regulatory burden. And every now and then, a bill is introduced that will do just that – help credit unions by directly reducing regulatory burden. Or as I like to say: “unscrambling those eggs.” Check out NAFCU's Legislative Resource Center, it has links to help you find your Representative, as well as other great resources such as NAFCU’s Grassroots Action Network. 

I don’t know about you, but I would much rather be spending my free time watching the Capitals playoffs than worrying about the points and fees calculations for qualified mortgages. 

What is Three-Dimensional Compliance?

Written by Steve Van Beek

Last week, I shared two slides from my upcoming presentation How the CFPB Impacts Your Credit Union at NAFCU's Directors Conference in Asheville, NC. One of the key takeaways will be the idea of Three-Dimensional Compliance.

So, what is Three-Dimensional Compliance? In short, it is a new way to think about the role compliance plays in the credit union. Here is a snippet from my article in the May/June The Federal Credit Union magazine:

"Beyond the Checklist

The creation of the CFPB means that credit unions need to review the role compliance plays in the credit union. Often the compliance officer is brought into a discussion late in the process, and her job is to approve or disapprove a particular action based on the regulatory requirements. Going forward, this “yes or no” approach to compliance will need to change. The CFPB’s focus is principle-based as well as requirement-based. Not only will credit unions need to determine if their product or service is compliant with laws, regulations and guidance, but they will also need to expend resources to document that the product or service provides a benefit to members.

When new requirements are issued, credit unions won’t be able to simply work through a checklist of new requirements and make tweaks to their products and disclosures. They will also need to undertake a three-dimensional analysis of the product or service, asking: 

• Why is the regulator taking this action?

• How were consumers impacted by the prior practices?

• How do consumers view the product or service?

• How does the credit union market the product or service?

• Does the credit union’s marketing of the product or service correspond with how the product or service is used by members? 

In other words, when regulators identify a product or service that has been abused (by either consumers or financial institutions), credit unions need to complete a full 360-degree review of their offerings in order to reduce their compliance, reputation and strategic risks."

You can find the full article here.

***

Reading the CFPB's Tea Leaves. If that message sounds like something your senior managers or Board needs to hear, be sure to pass along information about NAFCU's Annual Conference - specifically our Regulation & Economy Track. We'll be meeting in Boston from July 9-13 and you can see the description of my talk below:

Reading the CFPB’s Tea Leaves 

The pace of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rulemaking has put credit unions on the defensive. For example, the CFPB’s final mortgage regulations will require a complete overhaul of credit unions’ mortgage operations. Hear which requirements will need special time and attention from your staff and gain best practices to stay on track with your implementation plan. And, just as importantly, hear which areas the CFPB is looking at next. Today’s scrutiny leads to tomorrow’s regulatory requirements. We’ll discuss the CFPB’s focus on prepaid cards, private student lending, overdraft protection programs and checking account disclosures – including what steps your credit union can take now to prepare for new requirements. 
Steve Van Beek, Esq., NCCO, Director of Regulatory Compliance, NAFCU

Full information on the conference can be found here.

What Does Your Board Need to Know About the CFPB?

Written by Steve Van Beek

The headline above was my goal when I created a presentation for NAFCU's Board of Directors & Supervisory Committee Conference next month in Asheville, North Carolina. The first point is that the CFPB's regulations apply to all credit unions.

After that, you can see my overview and key takeaway slides below.

***

 

 

***

It's Not Too Late. Your Board can still sign up for the conference - May 15-17 in Asheville, NC - and we'll be having similar discussions at NAFCU's Annual Conference - July 9-13 in Boston, Massachusetts.  

Here is another question: How are you informing and updating your Board on the CFPB's actions (and potential actions)? 

2013 HMDA Getting it Right Guide; New NAFCU Calendar; Reg Alert on Escrow Proposal

Written by Steve Van Beek

2013 HMDA Guide. Yesterday, the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council (FFIEC) issued the 2013 HMDA Getting it Right! guide. According to the main page:

"The 2013 edition reflects the transfer of authority over Regulation C from the Federal Reserve Board to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Appendix D, comment 1003.2 (Financial Institution)-2 is updated with the asset-size threshold exemption applicable to collection of 2013 data. There are also minor changes to the general text of the Guide, including updates to Sources of Geographic Information and Submitting the LAR."

You can find the full PDF of the 2013 Guide here.  

***

Long Time Coming. Now, you may be wondering when the last version of the Guide was issued?  2010.  The 2011 version would have been the lame duck one when the Federal Reserve still had authority for Regulation C (HMDA). However, there was no guide issued. On July 21, 2011, the CFPB took over Regulation C and they failed to release a guide in 2012.  Fortunately, in year two, the CFPB found the time to update the Guide and provide guidance to HMDA-reporting institutions.

***

Garbage In, Garbage Out? The CFPB is a self-described "data-driven" agency. If you doubt it, take a read through this Bloomberg.com story: U.S. Amasses Data on 10 Million Consumers as Banks Object. To me, if you want to be data-driven - the best first step is to make sure your regulatory requirements are clear and understandable so that the data you collect (whether it be consumer complaints, HMDA data, or anything else) is as reliable as possible. But, that's just me.  

***

NAFCU Calendar.  NAFCU has a new calendar on our website that features:

• Compliance Deadlines;

• Important Regulatory Dates;

• Education & Conferences;

• CU Research Survey Deadlines; and

• Other Important Dates.

The calendar allows you to navigate month-by-month, click to find more information and add dates to your own calendar. For example, the "more information" link on the June 1st Escrow Changes Deadline includes this information:

CFPB Compliance Deadline: Escrow Requirement

Description:

Amended escrow requirements for higher-priced mortgage loans. Added a new small creditor exemption for credit unions that meet a four-part test.

Regulatory Text: 12 CFR 1026.35

NAFCU Compliance Blog: Mortgage Reform - Escrows

NAFCU Resources: www.nafcu.org/mortgagerules/#escrow

Download the latest full Compliance Calendar, including proposed regulations, past deadlines and more.

Date:Jun 01, 2013    

Add to Calendar                                             Back to Calendar

***

NAFCU Members. The Mortgage Rules webpage includes NAFCU's Regulatory Alert on the CFPB's recent proposed rule. The proposal was published in the Federal Register yesterday and only provided 15-days for comments (comments to NAFCU on the Regulatory Alert are due on Wednesday, April 24).  

Regulatory Relief: NAFCU Testimony on the Hill; Rep. Miller Announces Legislation. CFPB Issues ATR/QM Small Entity Compliance Guide.

Written by Michael Coleman, Regulatory Compliance Counsel

Yesterday, Bob Burrow, president and CEO of Bayer Heritage FCU in Proctor, W.Va., testified on behalf of NAFCU before the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit at a hearing on regulatory relief for credit unions. Mr. Burrow’s testimony stressed the need to provide credit unions the regulatory relief outlined in NAFCU’s five-point plan for credit union regulatory relief. You can find Mr. Burrow’s testimony here. For more details, see this NAFCU Today story.   

Also, House Financial Services Committee Vice Chairman Gary Miller, R-Calif., announced during a the hearing that he will introduce a credit union relief bill that draws on several concepts presented in NAFCU’s five-point plan. The legislation is likely to include efforts to implement a risk-based capital system for credit unions and give the NCUA flexibility in critical areas such as the ability to grant parity to a federal credit union on a broader state rule. Take a look at this NAFCU Today story for some more details.

***

ATR/QM Small Entity Compliance Guide. Yesterday, the CFPB issued a Small Entity Compliance Guide for the Ability to Repay/Qualified Mortgage final rule. As we mentioned in a blog post last week, the CFPB plans to issue more compliance guides (we hope) in the coming weeks. You can sign up to receive their announcements of the release of these materials on the CFPB’s regulations website (enter your email in the top right-hand corner). For now, you can also find the ATR/QM guide on the CFPB’s site for the ATR/QM rule. We will blog about the ATR/QM small entity compliance guide in more detail in future blog posts. 

***

In January, I took a vacation with my family to Iceland. The main goal was to catch a glimpse of the Northern Lights, which can be difficult to see at times depending on the conditions (cloud cover, solar activity, etc.) Thankfully, there was one night on the trip with perfect conditions, and we were treated to a phenomenal display. Now I can check it off my bucket list! Below are a couple photos (which don't do it justice), enjoy! 

I'm the really blurry one on the left. 

CFPB to Begin Issuing Information to Help Credit Unions Comply with Mortgage Rules

Written by Steve Van Beek

Last week I was at a conference with other credit union attorneys and I noted the only parts of the CFPB's Implementation Plan for the new mortgage rules was the press release (sent on February 13th) and one blog post on the preliminary rural and underserved counties list.

Well, the CFPB must have been listening because on Friday afternoon they announced their plans to provide their first substantive guides to the mortgage rules in the upcoming weeks.  Below is from their email:

"In the coming months, we’ll release plain language compliance guides, updates of the official interpretations, examination procedures, and other materials. We’re planning to release the first set of materials next week. 
 
If you’re in the mortgage industry or just want to know what we’re doing to help them get ready, sign up for our regulations-specific email list. The signup form is in the upper-right section of the page. 
 
consumerfinance.gov/Regulations 
 
A good implementation plan reduces confusion and costs for industry. That means less time figuring out what the rules mean and more time designing business practices that serve consumers and follow the rules. That’s a market that works better for everyone."

I'd encourage you to sign-up for the announcements and set aside time to review the materials the CFPB provides. 

***

Back in early 2013 (just before the rules were finalized) the CFPB reached out to NAFCU for input on their Implementation Plan for the Mortgage Rules. While I was hopeful at the time, as the days passed by I became more convinced the CFPB missed a huge opportunity by waiting so long to begin communicating with compliance officers on the new rules.

Below are the suggestions I sent to the CFPB back in January:  

• "Applicability.  It is very important to credit unions that the CFPB be specific regarding which new requirements apply to which types of mortgage products.  Credit unions usually think in terms of the mortgage products they offer and not which regulation might apply.  The more the CFPB can do to make distinctions in their communications (and in the actual regulation and commentary), the less burden credit unions will face.  Some of the distinctions that would allow credit unions to know if the regulations apply to their product are included below. 
  • Open-End Credit versus Closed-End Credit
  • First lien versus Subordinate lien
  • Principal dwelling versus Any dwelling
  • Real-estate secured versus secured by personal property (which might be a dwelling – e.g., manufactured homes, mobile homes)

• Fact Sheet for Compliance Officers.  In the CFPB’s prior releases, there have been Fact Sheets for consumers and Fact Sheets for the press.  It would be very helpful if the CFPB released a Fact Sheet for compliance officers. 

• Ask CFPB & Prior Q&As.  Compliance officers should have an avenue to ask questions about the applicability and requirements of the new regulations.  The CFPB would then be able to post these questions and answers on their website to provide guidance to other compliance officers.  Very similar to the process the CFPB already uses to provide information to consumers. 

• One-Page Document with Compliance Dates.  It would be very helpful if the CFPB created and released a one (or two) page document that contains the compliance dates for all the new requirements.

• Webinars and Small Entity Guides.  These are very helpful to credit unions.  However, in order to have the greatest impact – they need to be released in a timely manner and clearly explain the applicability of the new rules.

• Citations.  Whenever possible, the CFPB should use citations when discussing new requirements so that credit unions can conduct further research and analyze the underlying regulatory text, any staff commentary and the preamble to the new regulatory requirement. 

• Annotated Model Forms.  The CFPB’s proposed model forms for the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures included annotated model forms which allowed users to click on various sections of the model form and see the underlying citation and a link to the proposed rule.  Including this feature with the final rules would be extremely beneficial to credit unions – especially as they work with third-party forms providers.  The annotated model forms will allow credit unions to show their vendors the underlying regulatory requirement and why the particular language or formatting is required. 

• Break Up Topics/Changes Into Manageable Sections.  One of the aspects that NAFCU has found most effective in explaining large changes to regulations (such as from the Credit CARD Act or prior RESPA reform) has been to break up the new requirements in manageable pieces.  For example, the mortgage servicing sections could be clearly broken up in the following sections: (1) adjustable-rate notices; (2) periodic statements; (3) error resolution procedures; (4) information requests); etc.  This allows credit unions, who have very limited compliance staffs, to focus on certain changes initially and move on after implementing those changes rather than trying to comprehend the entire regulation at once."   

We'll have to wait and see how they do overall, but they certainly didn't make educating compliance officers a focus of their new rules. Instead, they worked the media angle and touted the past abuses by certain mortgage lenders and servicers while simply dumping the new rules and forcing everyone to wade through the 3507 pages.

***

And, I must include your Moment of Zen (or at least mine) for today. Go Blue!

CFPB Issues Final Rule to Remove ATM Fee Disclosure; The Cost of Compliance

Written by Steve Van Beek

Yesterday, the CFPB announced - via blog post - that they were issuing a final rule to amend Regulation E to remove the federal "on the machine" requirement for ATM fee disclosures.  Kudos to the CFPB for reading our blog post from last week and taking action to remove this unnecessary regulatory burden (the CFPB's inaccurate regulation; Congress had removed the requirement from the Electronic Funds Transfer Act three months ago).

Of course, it wouldn't be a CFPB blog post without a plea for consumers to submit a complaint.  Here is how the blog post ends:

"Congress recently amended the law about ATM fee disclosures to eliminate the sticker requirement. Now the CFPB is following the law by changing these rules. While this change means that consumers may no longer see a sticker on the ATM telling them that the ATM owner may charge a fee, the information about these charges, including the amount of the charge, will still appear on the ATM screen or a printout. The consumer will be able to cancel the ATM transaction without paying a dime.

At the CFPB, we work to ensure that consumers have the information they need to make informed decisions about their financial products and services. If you have had a confusing experience with ATM fees, you may contact the CFPB to tell us your story or submit a complaint."

Importantly, the final rule will be effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register. While it took the CFPB three months to follow Congress' command, at least they took the appropriate step and made the rule effective immediately.

***

Cost of Compliance.  Earlier in the week, the CFPB issued a blog post indicating they were studying the cost of complying with consumer financial regulations.  Below is the language from the post:

"We’re studying the costs of complying with consumer finance regulations

Banks, credit unions, and other financial services providers are concerned with compliance costs – how much it costs to comply with financial regulations – and we’re interested as well. Regulations can have many benefits for consumers, but the benefits sometimes come at a cost.

What we want to know
What are the extent and nature of compliance costs?

So, what are we doing?
Our Research, Markets, and Regulations team is studying the costs related to rules we inherited from other agencies. We want to increase public understanding of compliance costs. As a first step, we will talk to banks across the country about the costs they incur to comply with consumer regulations for deposit products and services. These include products like checking accounts and debit cards, which nearly all banks offer and most consumers use. Through our research, we hope to become better and smarter regulators."

Now, you may be thinking - with all the new regulatory requirements - the last thing we have time to do is spend time and resources quantifying the time and resources we're expending on complying with regulations!!

A completely understandable point. But, keep in mind that you don't need to respond directly to the CFPB or conduct a full analysis of your information.  NAFCU's research division collects information on a monthly basis from NAFCU members and uses this information to help inform NAFCU comment letters, letters to the Hill and outreach to the media.

Each month, NAFCU's research division sends out an Economic and CU Monitor survey which is summarized and reported in the Economic and CU Monitor.

So, if you don't have the time or resources to provide a full "compliance cost" evaluation - consider going to NAFCU’s Economic and CU Monitor page and complete the online survey each month. It only takes 15 minutes and you don't need to answer questions that aren't applicable or that you where you don't have the information at hand.

***

Have a great weekend!  And for all those at Compliance School this week - thanks for an outstanding week!  

Want to Give the Regulators a Piece of Your Mind? There's an APA for That

Written by Angela Meyster, Regulatory Affairs Counsel

Regulations can be costly, complicated, and troubling.  It can feel like government agencies are out of touch with the effects of their rulemaking and care little about the burdens they impose on you.  Don't you wish you could tell them how you feel, or even change their minds, before they take action?

Well, good news! The nice people in Congress gave you an outlet for your concern…worries…or… outright rage: the Administrative Procedures Act and its Notice and Comment rulemaking process.

As NAFCU regulatory affairs counsel, I rely on this process to voice member concerns and advocate on behalf of the credit union industry on a weekly basis.  But you don’t have to work for a trade association - or even be an attorney - to participate.  Anyone can write a comment letter.

***

How the notice and comment process works:

Statutory Authorization. There needs to be a statute that tells an agency to solve a particular set of problems and gives it the power to make the rules to do so. Have you heard of the Dodd-Frank Act?  Too soon?

Notice. Once the agency has identified an approach to meeting its stated goal, and has drawn up proposed rules to do so, it will provide a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).

Note: An agency may publish the NPRM on its website for a significant period of time before actually entering it into the Federal Register.  Think of it as an elaborate Easter egg hunt, where at the end of game you don’t get chocolate but a ton of regulations with which your credit union has to now figure out a way to comply.  Luckily here at NAFCU we have some tips on how to track regulations in the Federal Register.

This is where you come in:  This is your opportunity to digest everything the agency has put out there and formulate an opinion on it.  Usually the agency identifies specific areas on which it would like feedback, but its blanket request for comment “on any other aspect of the proposal” means that you can and should write to them about anything that concerns you about the proposed rule.

Here at NAFCU we quickly translate the convoluted legal jargon the agency has put out into something comprehensible and send it off to our members in the form of “Regulatory Alerts” for their input.  Based on this input, we write a comment letter representing the interests of NAFCU members and send it off to the agency. But we also work with our members if they want to send their own comment letters.  Every time you see a Regulatory Alert is an opportunity to get your voice heard twice.

There is certainly a benefit to voicing your concern through a trade association’s comment letter. It represents the overall sentiment of a large representative population of the industry on an issue, giving it additional clout. It also allows you to voice your opinion indirectly on a potentially delicate issue. If you don't want to make your credit union's view public - all comment letters are public information - providing your input to NAFCU can help get your message across discretely. 

Review. After the comment deadline, the agency must review the comments carefully. Often, if a comment letter contains new data, policy arguments, or hypothetical scenarios the agency did not think of in formulating its proposed regulation, the agency will either revise its proposed rule or elaborate on something that was unclear.  Bottom line: you can make a difference here. 

The Notice and Comment process is a powerful tool for stakeholders and regulators alike, although not every agency has chosen to adhere to the APA…but that’s a blog post for someone else. When it comes down to it, a lot of agencies want to hear what you have to say and it’s important for you to say it.  Many agencies lack the operational knowledge to fully understand the practical results and consequences of their regulations and that’s where the notice and comment process proves its worth.  After the agency finalizes its regulation it is an uphill climb for changes (even Congress struggles with this), so proactive measures in the proposed stages are crucial.

Here are some tips for writing effective comment letters:

• Outline of the letter: include the docket number, an introduction (tell them about yourself and why your opinion matters), and which specific aspects of the proposal on which you are commenting;

• Don’t feel compelled to comment on every aspect of a proposal - if only one part affects you, just comment on that one;

• The most persuasive feedback often includes real-world data and specificity;

• Your comments do not need to be just critical - you should express your support for any portion of the proposal you agree with; and

• Suggest alternatives that both meet the agency’s goals and reduce your compliance costs.

And, of course - provide NAFCU with your feedback on our Regulatory Alerts to help us as we attempt to educate the regulators.  

Help is Here: NAFCU’s 2013 Credit Union Compliance GPS

Written By JiJi Bahhur, Regulatory Compliance Counsel

We talk to credit unions every day. And, we hear the same concerns, fears and frustrations:

• How do we keep up?
• How do we know if this is the latest information?
• Where can I find that guidance document?
• When will someone explain this information in plain English?
• How do we get everyone on the same page without busting our limited training budget?

It is with these conversations in mind that we created the GPS and are pleased to announce the 2013 edition (with a very shameless plug).

***

NAFCU's Credit Union Compliance GPS - 2013 Edition. Hot off the electronic presses is the 2013 edition of NAFCU’s Credit Union Compliance GPS.  Written by NAFCU's compliance team, this electronic manual spans almost 500 pages and covers everything from the basic anatomy of a federal credit union to specific regulations from the NCUA, CFPB, and more.  It is the ideal companion for all credit union compliance officers and staff, consultants, vendors and attorneys.  The GPS translates complex regulatory language into plain English to help credit unions on a day-to-day basis while at that same time providing links to the applicable regulations, laws, and guidance documents.

And here’s the great part – you don’t have to be a NAFCU member to purchase the GPS.  The GPS is available to anyone and everyone at one affordable price ― $399 for NAFCU members and $499 for nonmembers. One purchase allows you to share the electronic manual with your entire credit union or business. And for no additional cost, your purchase of the 2013 GPS includes access to NAFCU’s new Scope & Applicability Charts to help you make sense of the CFPB’s new mortgage rules.

If your credit union has a prior version of the GPS (via purchase or attending a prior Regulatory Compliance School), you'd need to purchase the new 2013 GPS in order to receive the latest information. We've put a ton of time and effort into thoroughly reviewing the 2013 GPS to reflect regulatory changes. Additionally, we provided some additional bells and whistles to the 2013 GPS based on credit union feedback:

• an expanded section on the CFPB;
• user-friendly bookmarks, hyperlinks and pagination for easy navigation; and
• enhanced study tips for those studying for the NAFCU Certified Compliance Officer (NCCO) exams.

For a closer look, click here and check out our “sneak peek” documents available in the tabs to the right-hand side of the webpage (e.g., main table of contents, one page table of contents, section by section listing). 

***

NAFCU Certified Compliance Officer (NCCO) Program. NAFCU’s Credit Union Compliance GPS serves as the learning manual for NAFCU’s annual Regulatory Compliance School held each March.  NAFCU also offers a self-study program which allows anyone interested in obtaining a solid foundation of the compliance issues facing credit unions to take the four exams required to earn the NCCO designation.

If you are interested in the GPS, take a look at our new NCCO Exam Study Guide (opens as a PDF) and consider taking the next step and obtaining your NCCO.